Legal Opinion

Reingold v. Harper

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided January 8, 1951PublishedCited by 70 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Heher, J.

The question here is the constitutional sufficiency of Ch. 274 of the Session Laws of 1949, entitled “An> *189Act to regulate the sale and dispensing of gasoline or other inflammable liquid at retail filling and service stations and providing penalties for violations.” P. L., ¶. 846; N. J. 8. A. 34.-3A-1 et seq. Thereby, it is made unlawful for an owner, operator or employee of an owner or operator of a retail filling or service station of the class described in the ■title “to permit any purchaser, customer or other person not connected with the…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. Jacobson v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
  3. United States v. Carolene Products Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
  4. Sproles v. BinfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  5. Sterling v. ConstantinSupreme Court of the United States · 1932

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by70 opinions

  1. Hutton Pk. Gardens v. West Orange Town CouncilSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1975
  2. Phillips v. CurialeSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1992
  3. Brunetti v. Borough of New MilfordSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1975
  4. Chase Manhattan Bank v. JosephsonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1994
  5. NJ Sports & Exposition Auth. v. McCraneNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1971

65 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API