Legal Opinion
Winslow Lumber Co. v. Edward Hines Lumber Co.
Oregon Supreme Court
Decided March 13, 1928PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCoshow, J.
It is immaterial where the cause of action arose. It is immaterial where the plaintiff has its domicile. The action is a transitory one. Plaintiff may therefore sue the defendant at any place personal service can be made upon defendant: Or. L., §§ 42-44; Fratt v. Wilson, 30 Or. 542, 545 (47 Pac. 706, 48 Pac. 356); State ex rel. v. Tazwell, 123 Or. 326 (266 Pac. 348); Cole v. Canadian Bank of Commerce, 114 Or. 456 (239 Pac. 98); 14a C. J. 1383, § 4099, notes 73 and 74; Barrow Steamship Co. v. Kane, 170 U. S. 100 (42 L. Ed. 964, 18 Sup. Ct. Rep. 526, see, also, Rose’s U. S. Notes).
Defendant…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Eastman Kodak Co. v. Southern Photo Materials Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Tauza v. . Susquehanna Coal Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1917
- International Harvester Co. of America v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Green v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1907
- People's Tobacco Co. v. American Tobacco Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1918
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Enco, Inc. v. F. C. Russell Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1957
- State Ex Rel. Hupp Motor Car Corp. v. KanzlerOregon Supreme Court · 1929
- Mergenthaler Linotype Co. v. Spokesman Publishing Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1928
- State Ex Rel. Massachusetts Bonding & Insurance v. UpdegraffOregon Supreme Court · 1943
- Schultz v. Long Island MacHinery & Equipment Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1937
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.