Graceville State Bank v. Hofschild
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
Taylor, C.
Action in replevin to obtain possession of the grain raised on a farm in Traverse county in the year 1924. The trial court directed a verdict for defendant, and plaintiff appealed from an order denying its motion for judgment non obstante or for a new trial.
Tbe parties stipulated as to tbe quantity of grain and its value, and the question presented is whether tbe plaintiff or tbe defendant is entitled to it.
In September, 1917, John S. Baer, who then owned tbe farm, entered into a contract with Casper Brog by which Baer agreed to sell and Brog agreed to buy tbe farm for tbe sum-of…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Aultman & Taylor Co. v. O'DowdSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1898
- Mathwig v. StrandSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1916
- Tingue v. PatchSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1904
- O'Connor v. HughesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1886
- Woodcock v. CarlsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1889
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Romain v. Pebble Creek PartnersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
- Lawrence Zirinsky v. James L. Sheehan, John D. Sheehan and Brooklyn Center Industrial Park, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1969
- Mehl v. NortonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1937
- Raasch v. GouletNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1929
- Jandric v. SkahenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1951
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.