Legal Opinion

Sly v. SOUTH CENTRAL BELL TELEPHONE CO.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided July 25, 1980No. 79-257PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MADDOX, Justice.

This appeal involves the extent of the duty owed by a telephone company to one who is not a subscriber.

The case arose from South Central’s termination of telephone service to two of its customers, both business corporations, Security Bail Bonds, Inc., and The Better Business Bureau of Etowah-Calhoun County. The two corporations shared office space, and a receptionist answered both numbers. The plaintiff-appellant, Dona Sly, gave South Central Bell his oral guarantee to enable these two businesses to obtain phone service without posting the security deposit normally required by…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Southwestern Telegraph & Telephone Co. v. DanaherSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  2. Havard v. PALMER & BAKER ENGINEERS, INC.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1974
  3. Federal Mogul Corp. v. Universal Const. Co.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1979
  4. Pike v. Southern Bell Telephone and Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1955
  5. Sims v. Alabama Water Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1920

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Russell v. Birmingham Oxygen Service, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1981
  2. Sly v. South Central Bell Tel. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API