Legal Opinion
Federal Mogul Corp. v. Universal Const. Co.
Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama
Decided August 8, 1979No. Civ. 1934PublishedCited by 44 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.]
This is an appeal by Federal Mogul Corporation, the owner of a tapered roller bearing plant in Hamilton, Alabama, from a jury instruction limiting damages against Universal Construction Company and Pearce, DeMoss and Company, Inc., to a nominal amount. Plaintiff, Federal Mogul, further appeals from a directed verdict in favor of defendants Interstate Roofing Company, Johns-Manville Sales Corporation, and Wiley and Wilson, Inc.
Suit was brought in Jefferson County…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Atkins v. American Motors Corp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1976
- E. C. Ernst, Inc. v. Manhattan Construction Company of Texas, Providence Hospital, Fairbanks-Morse, Inc., Charles H. McCauley Associates, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977
- Reigel Fiber Corporation v. Anderson Gin Company, Reibel Fiber Corporation v. Ellis BrothersCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975
- Alabama Power Co. v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1947
- Home Insurance Company v. Stuart-McCorkle, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1973
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by44 opinions
- McBro Planning and Development Company and McCarthy Brothers Company, a Joint Venture v. Triangle Electrical Construction Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1984
- Berkel & Co. Contractors v. Providence Hosp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1984
- Pierce Associates, Inc. v. Nemours FoundationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1988
- Aliant Bank v. Four Star Invs., Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2017
- Sheetz, Aiken & Aiken, Inc. v. SPANN ETC., INC.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1987
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.