Legal Opinion

Quaranta v. Merlini

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 27, 1987No. A028677PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BARRY-DEAL, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment of dismissal of an action for failure to serve and return the summons within the three-year period provided for in former Code of Civil Procedure section 581a. We must decide whether it was error for the trial court to dismiss the action even though service by publication had earlier been ordered and effected after the statutory three-year period had run. We conclude that respondent was not amenable to service, that the statute of limitations was tolled, and that service was effected pursuant to the orders granting appellants’ motions to…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  2. Mennonite Board of Missions v. AdamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Wyoming Pacific Oil Co. v. PrestonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
  4. Barrington v. A. H. Robins Co.California Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Rue v. QuinnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Watts v. CrawfordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Kott v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
  3. Marriage of Abu-Dalbouh v. Abu-DalbouhCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1996
  4. Perez v. SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
  5. Zhao v. Tradego Forex ExchangeDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API