Legal Opinion
Womble v. Mahoney
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided June 18, 1963No. 40159PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JOHNSON, Justice.
Prior to the time this controversy arose, the plaintiff in error, Marvin Womble, hereafter referred to as defendant, was the owner of the surface of Lots 1 and 2, Block 6, Sunrise Addition to Healdton, Carter County, Oklahoma. The defendant in error, hereafter referred to as plaintiff, was the owner of the mineral estate underlying said land.
On April 24, 1939, the defendant acquired a resale tax deed to the said premises. ■’ On June 29, 1959, his attorney wrote plaintiff the following letter:
“ * * ⅜
“Dear Mrs. Boone and Mrs. Mahoney:
“On the 24th day of February, 1955, Marty T.…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Pacific Mutual Life Insurance v. GlaserSupreme Court of Missouri · 1912
- Maloy v. SmithSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1959
- Colby v. StevensonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1953
- Baas v. ZinkeMichigan Supreme Court · 1922
- Hatcher v. Union Trust Co. of MarylandSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1928
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Schepp v. HessSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989
- Gatz v. Southwest Bank of OmahaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1988
- Howell v. JamesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1991
- Watkins v. Grady County Soil & Water Conservation DistrictSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1968
- Alan G. Moats and Chleo I. Moats v. Professional Assistance, LLC, d/b/a Summit Title Services, Kuzma Success Realty, and P. Olen Snider, Jr.Wyoming Supreme Court · 2014
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.