Hatcher v. Union Trust Co. of Maryland
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
Olsen, C.
The action is brought to have the court set aside and cancel a trust deed and the notes secured thereby on the ground that the deed and notes provide for the payment of interest in excess of the rate permitted by the laws of this state and are therefore usurious and void. The trial court found that .the deed and notes were not usurious and denied plaintiffs any relief on that ground. The court did find that certain notes, designated as second series notes, should be canceled on other grounds. Motions for amended and additional findings Avere made by each of the parties and denied.…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Schmidt v. SchmidtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1891
- Benson v. MarkoeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1887
- Smith v. ParsonsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1893
- St. Nicholas Church v. KroppSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1916
- Graham v. FittsSupreme Court of Florida · 1907
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Noteman v. WelchCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1939
- Mesaba Loan Co. v. SherSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1938
- VanderWeyst v. First State Bank of BensonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- Gethsemane Lutheran Church v. ZachoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1960
- Hall v. Mortgage Security Corp. of AmericaWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1937
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.