San Remo Hotel v. City of San Francisco
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
TASHIMA, Circuit Judge:
Success is sometimes said to be the father of failure, and this and like eases are before the courts because San Francisco’s success in attracting tourists has fathered a failure in an adequate stock of housing for the low income and disadvantaged population of the City. In 1990, the City and County of San Francisco (the “City”) revised its Hotel Conversion Ordinance (“HCO”) to increase restrictions on the use of hotel rooms for tourists and to increase the expense of converting a hotel room from residential to tourist use. This revised, ordinance has triggered several…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Railroad Comm'n of Tex. v. Pullman Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Williamson County Regional Planning Commission v. Hamilton Bank of Johnson CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Arizonans for Official English v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- 98 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 4219, 98 Daily Journal D.A.R. 5827 the San Remo Hotel Thomas Field Robert Field T & R Investment Corp. v. City and County of San Francisco, a Municipal Corporation Department of City Planning Board of Permit Appeals San Francisco Board of SupervisorsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
- Citizens for Free Speech, LLC v. Cnty. of AlamedaDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2018
- Arizona Department of Child Safety v. Allegra GreenDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2021