Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. Jasper
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
GARRECHT, Circuit Judge.
This is an action for a declaratory judgment.
*267Briefly, the facts are: The appellant insurance company issued to Harold E. Wells a policy of automobile liability insurance which contained what is known as an “omnibus” provision, which extends the insurance coverage in addition to the named insured [Wells] to any person using the automobile provided the actual use is with the permission of the named insured. On June 28, 1942, Dake, an employee of the named insured, while driving the insured truck, was involved in a collision, which, resulted in the death of Emmett C.…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Fox v. Summit King Mines, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1944
- Pacific American Fisheries v. HoofCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1923
- United States v. Chinook Inv. Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1943
- National Surety Co. v. Globe Grain & Milling Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1919
3Cited by3 opinions
- 5 Fair empl.prac.cas. 204, 5 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 8034 George H. Williamson, Jr. v. Bethlehem Steel CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1972
- State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Birmingham Elec. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1950
- United States v. SheffCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1952