Legal Opinion
Fox v. Summit King Mines, Ltd.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided June 27, 1944No. 10526PublishedCited by 43 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GARRECHT, Circuit Judge.
This action was instituted by eleven former employees of the Summit King Mines, Limited, a Nevada corporation (appellee herein), to recover unpaid overtime compensation allegedly due them under the provisions of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, Title 29 U.S.C.A. §§ 201-219, 52 Stat. 1060 (hereinafter referred to as the Act), together with liquidated damages, attorneys fees and costs as provided in the Act.
Appellee denies that there is any unpaid compensation due the appellants and also denies that it was engaged in commerce within the provisions of the Act.
By…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Caminetti v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
- Edwards v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- International Textbook Co. v. PiggSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
- National Labor Relations Board v. Sunshine Mining Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1940
- Atlantic Co. v. WallingCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1942
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by43 opinions
- Ted L. Lindow v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- Billy H. Forrester v. Roth's I. G. A. Foodliner, Incorporated, an Oregon CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
- Jerry S. Davis, and James O. Slice and Jack L. Pforr v. Food LionCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1986
- Gulf King Shrimp Company v. W. Willard Wirtz, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of LaborCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
- Public Water Supply Co. v. DiPasqualeSupreme Court of Delaware · 1999
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.