National Surety Co. v. Globe Grain & Milling Co.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
In Error to the District Court of the United States for the Southern Division of the Southern District of California; Oscar A. Triplet, Judge. Action by the Globe Grain & Milling Company against the National Surety Company. There was a judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the Court
ROSS, Circuit Judge.
The defendant in error applied to the plaintiff in error to become surety, beginning October 15, 1915, for certain of its employes tor the amounts and in the positions set opposite their names, respectively, including one T. F. Hayes.
“Those employes, and. each and every of them, while In the service of the undersigned employer,” the application expressly declared, “have always performed their respective duties in a faithful and satisfactory maimer. There has never come to the notice or knowledge of the employer any act, fact, or. information tending to Indicate that they…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Dooley v. PeaseSupreme Court of the United States · 1901
- Guarantee Co. of North America v. Mechanics' Savings Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1902
- Tyng v. GrinnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
- Meyer v. Everett Pulp & Paper Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1912
3Cited by7 opinions
- Pabst Brewing Co. v. E. Clemens Horst Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1920
- Smith v. Federal Surety Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1932
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Commercial Nat. BankCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1933
- Nonantum Inv. Co. v. Maryland Casualty Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1932
- Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. JasperCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1944
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.