(PC) Howell v. Camargo
District Court, E.D. California
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 Case No. 1:19-cv-00266-SKO (PC) KAREEM J. HOWELL, 11 ORDER REQUIRING PLAINTIFF TO EITHER FILE FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT OR Plaintiff, 12 NOTIFY COURT OF WILLINGNESS TO PROCEED ONLY ON CLAIM I AGAINST v. 13 DEFENDANTS CAMARGO, MORROW, MUNOZ, RANDOLPH, BARONA, AND SAUCEDO CAMARGO, et al., 14 (Doc. 1) Defendants. 15 TWENTY-ONE (21) DAY DEADLINE 16 17 INTRODUCTION 18 A. Background 19 Plaintiff, Kareem J. Howell, is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in 20 this civil rights action pursuant to 42…
2Cases cited51 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.