Legal Opinion

(PC) Howell v. Camargo

District Court, E.D. California

Decided August 15, 2019No. 1:19-cv-00266Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 Case No. 1:19-cv-00266-SKO (PC) KAREEM J. HOWELL, 11 ORDER REQUIRING PLAINTIFF TO EITHER FILE FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT OR Plaintiff, 12 NOTIFY COURT OF WILLINGNESS TO PROCEED ONLY ON CLAIM I AGAINST v. 13 DEFENDANTS CAMARGO, MORROW, MUNOZ, RANDOLPH, BARONA, AND SAUCEDO CAMARGO, et al., 14 (Doc. 1) Defendants. 15 TWENTY-ONE (21) DAY DEADLINE 16 17 INTRODUCTION 18 A. Background 19 Plaintiff, Kareem J. Howell, is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in 20 this civil rights action pursuant to 42…

2Cases cited51 opinions

  1. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  3. Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API