Rogers v. Parrish
Supreme Court of Vermont
1Opinion of the CourtBurgess, J.
¶ 1. In Hawkes v. Spence we addressed the “seemingly irreconcilable conflict” that arises when a “custodial parent’s interest in building a new life with the children” in a distant location is “pitted against the noncustodial parent’s interest in maintaining a close relationship with the children.” 2005 VT 57, ¶ 1, 178 Vt. 161, 878 A.2d 273. While acknowledging that “there is no precise formula” for resolving such conflicts, we adopted a governing standard and a nonexclusive list of relevant factors that trial courts must apply in determining whether a reexamination of parental rights and…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Myott v. MyottSupreme Court of Vermont · 1988
- Harris v. HarrisSupreme Court of Vermont · 1988
- Houran, Admr. v. Preferred Acc. Ins. Co. of N.Y.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1938
- Cooperative Fire Insurance v. White Caps, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1997
- Dyer v. LalorSupreme Court of Vermont · 1920
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- C. Paige Hinkson v. Stuart StevensSupreme Court of Vermont · 2020
- Hanson-Metayer v. Hanson-MetayerSupreme Court of Vermont · 2013
- Tracy McIntire Quinones v. Patrick C. BouffardSupreme Court of Vermont · 2017
- Falanga v. BoylanSupreme Court of Vermont · 2015
- Jennifer Knapp (Dasler) v. Timothy DaslerSupreme Court of Vermont · 2024
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.