Hoover (Letourneau) v. Hoover
Supreme Court of Vermont
1Opinion of the CourtMorse, J.
In this custody dispute, mother appeals from the Rutland Family Court’s modification order awarding sole custody of two of the parties’ three children to father. The decision modified the parties’ shared legal and physical parental rights and responsibilities.1 Mother challenges the factual findings that served as the basis for the court’s modification. We affirm.
The court concluded that both parents were actively involved in their children’s daily lives following their divorce. Until August 1998, both parties resided in Rutland. Their divorce in 1996 did not result in any changes of schools…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Myott v. MyottSupreme Court of Vermont · 1988
- Highgate Associates, Ltd. v. MerryfieldSupreme Court of Vermont · 1991
- DeBeaumont v. GoodrichSupreme Court of Vermont · 1994
- Lane v. SchenckSupreme Court of Vermont · 1992
- Kilduff v. WilleySupreme Court of Vermont · 1988
3Cited by82 opinions
- Jeffrey R. Arnott v. Paula a/k/a Polly A. ArnottWyoming Supreme Court · 2012
- Quenneville v. ButtolphSupreme Court of Vermont · 2003
- Hawkes v. SpenceSupreme Court of Vermont · 2005
- Habecker v. GiardSupreme Court of Vermont · 2003
- Sundstrom v. SundstromSupreme Court of Vermont · 2004
77 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.