Legal Opinion
Stalcup v. Job Service North Dakota
North Dakota Supreme Court
Decided April 12, 1999No. 980248PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
VANDE WALLE, Chief Justice.
[¶ 1] Tammie Stalcup appealed from a district court judgment affirming Job Service North Dakota’s denial of unemployment compensation benefits. A preponderance of the evidence shows Stalcup was discharged for misconduct under section 52-06-02(2), N.D.C.C., disqualifying her from receiving benefits. We affirm.
I
[¶2] Stalcup was employed for approximately seven and a half years at Northern Plains Natural Gas Company. Northern Plains has a drug policy which Stalcup was informed of and agreed to follow. This policy provides that “[t]he corrective action for an employee…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- 300 Gramatan Avenue Associates v. State Division of Human RightsNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
- Matter of Carroll v. . Knickerbocker Ice Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1916
- Schadler v. Job Service North DakotaNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
- Industrial Claims Appeals Office v. Flower Stop Marketing Corp.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1989
- Allan Rustan Estate v. O'ConnellNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1991
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Baier v. Job Service North DakotaNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
- Spectrum Care LLC v. StevickNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
- Hjelden v. Job Service North DakotaNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
- In re N.J.A.C.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2017
- Schweitzer v. Job Service North DakotaNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.