Schweitzer v. Job Service North Dakota
North Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
CROTHERS, Justice.
[¶ 1] Crystal Schweitzer appeals from a district court judgment affirming a Job Service decision concluding LM Glasfíber terminated Schweitzer’s employment for reasons that constitute disqualifying misconduct and denying her claim for unemployment benefits. We affirm, concluding Job Service’s findings of fact are supported by a preponderance of the evidence and its conclusion that Schweitzer engaged in disqualifying misconduct is supported by its findings.
I
[¶ 2] Schweitzer began working full time for LM Glasfiber in February 2005, and later began working as a facilities…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- May v. SprynczynatykNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
- Perske v. Job Service North DakotaNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1983
- Carlson v. Job Service North DakotaNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
- Marion v. Job Service North DakotaNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1991
- Stalcup v. Job Service North DakotaNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Willits v. Job Service North DakotaNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
- Grina v. Job Serv. N. DakotaNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2019
- Addai v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2012
- Tronnes v. Job Service North DakotaNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2012
- Crandall v. CrandallNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.