Legal Opinion

Hamilton v. Ohio Sav. Bank

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided June 10, 1998No. 1996-2624PublishedCited by 52 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 82 Ohio St.3d 67.] HAMILTON ET AL., APPELLANTS AND CROSS-APPELLEES, v. OHIO SAVINGS BANK, APPELLEE AND CROSS-APPELLANT. [Cite as Hamilton v. Ohio Sav. Bank,

1998-Ohio-365.] Banks—Action brought by individuals on behalf of themselves and others similarly situated to challenge certain methods used to amortize residential mortgage loans by bank—Determining whether, and to what extent, trial court properly refused to certify case as a class action pursuant to Civ.R. 23. (No. 96-2624—Submitted January 20, 1998—Decided June 10, 1998.)…

2Cases cited52 opinions

  1. Amchem Products, Inc. v. WindsorSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  2. General Telephone Co. of Southwest v. FalconSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Bowen v. City of New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Gulf Oil Co. v. BernardSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  5. Dianne Castano v. The American Tobacco CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1996

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by52 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Davis v. Public Employees Retirement BoardOhio Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Lycan v. Cleveland (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2016
  3. In re Consol. Mtge. Satisfaction CasesOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Baughman v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Lycan v. ClevelandOhio Court of Appeals · 2019

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API