Legal Opinion

Hershey v. Reclamation District No. 730

California Supreme Court

Decided March 25, 1912No. S.F. No. 6036PublishedCited by 3 opinions

APPLICATION for a Writ of Mandate directed to Reclamation District No. 730 and to the Board of Trustees thereof. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtMelvin, J.

This is a proceeding in mandamus by which petitioners seek to compel the Reclamation District through its officers to accept a certain registered warrant of the district in satisfaction of a judgment whereby an assessment against the land of petitioners was judicially found to be valid and a lien was declared against the said property. The sum due upon the warrant, with accrued interest, exceeds the amount of the judgment including costs of suit, but petitioners offered to pay the equivalent of the costs in money, and to waive the excess of the warrant and interest thereon over the tax as…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Hagar v. Reclamation District No. 108Supreme Court of the United States · 1884
  2. Poindexter v. GreenhowSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  3. New Orleans v. ClarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  4. Holtum v. GriefCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  5. Hartman v. GreenhowSupreme Court of the United States · 1881

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Axness v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
  2. Christophel v. RileyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
  3. Axness v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API