Legal Opinion

Christophel v. Riley

California Supreme Court

Decided January 22, 1929No. Docket No. S.F. 13044PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWaste, C. J.

Petition for writ of mandate to compel the respondents as controller and treasurer, respectively, of the state of California, to credit petitioner, as treasurer of Sacramento County, with the amount of a certain warrant tendered by a land owner to, and accepted by, petitioner in part payment of Sutter-Butte By-Pass Assessment No. 6, levied upon land owners in the Sacramento and San Joaquin Drainage District.

The Sacramento and San Joaquin Drainage District is a state agency, legally created, and the management and control thereof is vested in the reclamation board of the state of California.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In Re Sutter-Butte By-Pass Assessment No. 6California Supreme Court · 1923
  2. San Francisco & Fresno Land Co. v. BanburyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Hershey v. Reclamation District No. 730California Supreme Court · 1912

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Bear River Sand & Gravel Corp. v. County of PlacerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
  2. County of Calaveras v. Calaveras County Water DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API