Legal Opinion
Trinity Industries, Inc. v. Road Systems, Inc.
District Court, E.D. Texas
Decided September 20, 2000No. 1:98-CV-1623PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SCHELL, District Judge.
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER CONSTRUING THE CLAIMS OF UNITED STATES PATENT h,928,928
Before the court is “Plaintiffs’ Motion for Construction of the Patent at Issue under Markman and Brief in Support” (Dkt.# 30), filed June 22, 1999. The patent at issue is No. 4,928,928 being asserted by Plaintiffs Trinity Industries, Inc. and the Texas A & M University System against Defendants Road Systems, Inc., Interstate Steel Corporation, and Kaddo Kothmann. The constructions and supporting analysis in this opinion are the result of a review and study of the claims, specification,…
2Cases cited52 opinions
- MARKMAN Et Al. v. WESTVIEW INSTRUMENTS, INC., Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Herbert Markman and Positek, Inc. v. Westview Instruments, Inc. And Althon Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
- Vitronics Corporation v. Conceptronic, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
- Warner-Jenkinson Co. v. Hilton Davis Chemical Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Cybor Corporation v. Fas Technologies, Inc., and Fastar Ltd., Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- American Innotek, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2013
- Duhn Oil Tool, Inc. v. Cooper Cameron Corp.District Court, E.D. California · 2007
- BARRY v. DEPUY SYNTHES COMPANIESDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2023
- Trinity Industries, Inc. v. ROAD SYSTEMS, INC.District Court, E.D. Texas · 2002
- Trinity Industries, Inc. v. Road Systems, Inc.District Court, E.D. Texas · 2002