Legal Opinion
American Innotek, Inc. v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided May 24, 2013No. 11-223CPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CLAIM CONSTRUCTION OPINION AND ORDER
WILLIAMS, Judge.
This patent infringement case involves bags for the containment and disposal of bodily fluids. Plaintiff, American Innotek, Inc., the owner of U.S. Patent No. 5,116,139 (“the ’139 Patent”) entitled “Fluid Containment Bag,” manufactures a product called The Flight Extender™ according to the’139 Patent and sold this product to the United States military from 1991 to 2001. Plaintiff claims that the United States infringed its patent by purchasing a containment bag called the “Piddle Pak” from the New York City Industries for the Blind…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Edward H. Phillips v. Awh Corporation, Hopeman Brothers, Inc., and Lofton Corporation, Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
- Vitronics Corporation v. Conceptronic, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
- Warner-Jenkinson Co. v. Hilton Davis Chemical Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Cybor Corporation v. Fas Technologies, Inc., and Fastar Ltd., Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
- Microsoft Corp. v. i4i Ltd. PartnershipSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- American Innotek, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016
- American Innotek, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016
- American Innotek, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016
- Factor2 Multimedia Systems, LLC v. The United States of America as the United States Patent and Trademark Office, et al.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2026