Legal Opinion
Duhn Oil Tool, Inc. v. Cooper Cameron Corp.
District Court, E.D. California
Decided February 1, 2007No. 1:05-CV-01411 OWW LJOPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER RE CLAIM INTERPRETATION
WANGER, District Judge.
1. INTRODUCTION
Before the court are the parties’ motions for a Markman claim interpretation of United States Patent No. 6,920,925 (the “'925 Patent” or the “Patent”). (Doc. 40, Duhn Oil’s Claim Construction Brief, Filed August 21, 2006 (“Pl.Brief”); Doc. 43, Defendant’s Opening Markman Brief, Filed August, 21, 2006 (“Def.Brief”).) Oral argument was heard on October 11, 2006.
2. PROCEDURAL HISTORY
Plaintiff Duhn Oil Tool, Inc. (“Duhn Oil” or “Plaintiff’) filed its complaint for patent infringement against Defendant…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Edward H. Phillips v. Awh Corporation, Hopeman Brothers, Inc., and Lofton Corporation, Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
- Vitronics Corporation v. Conceptronic, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
- Cybor Corporation v. Fas Technologies, Inc., and Fastar Ltd., Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
- Festo Corp. v. Shoketsu Kinzoku Kogyo Kabushiki Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- United States Gypsum Co. v. Lafarge North America, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2007
- Eolas Technologies, Inc. v. Adobe Systems, Inc.District Court, E.D. Texas · 2011