Legal Opinion

Trinity Industries, Inc. v. ROAD SYSTEMS, INC.

District Court, E.D. Texas

Decided December 12, 2002No. Case 1:98-CV-1623Published

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION OF CLAIM CONSTRUCTION OF U.S. PATENT No. 4,928,928

SCHELL, District Judge.

This matter is before the court on “Plaintiffs’ Motion .and Brief for Reconsideration of Claim Construction of U.S. Patent No. 4,928,928” filed by Plaintiffs Trinity Industries, Inc. (“Trinity”) and The Texas A & M University System (“TAMU”) (collectively “Plaintiffs”) on May 8, 2002 (Dkt.# 226). Defendants Road Systems, Inc., Interstate Steel Corporation, Kaddo Kothmann, Safety by Design, Inc., John Reid, and Dean Sicking (collectively “Defendants”) filed a response…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Vitronics Corporation v. Conceptronic, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
  2. Trinity Industries, Inc. v. Road Systems, Inc.District Court, E.D. Texas · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API