Giffen v. Taylor.
Indiana Supreme Court
Prom tlie Marshall Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtHoward, C. J.
This was an action brought by appellee against appellants, to set aside a deed and to quiet title to real estate, and for damages.
There was a finding of facts by the court, followed by conclusions of law and a judgment in favor of appellee.
The first and second assignments of error, calling in question the sufficiency of the complaint, are presented, as. counsel say in their brief, “only out of caution, believing the whole merit of the case can be better raised on the third" assignment of error”; and they remark further: “We regard the merits of the case as more readily presentable under the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Tinkler v. SwaynieIndiana Supreme Court · 1880
- Cox v. ArnsmannIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
- Catalani v. CatalaniIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
- Myers v. JacksonIndiana Supreme Court · 1893
3Cited by11 opinions
- Ransdel v. MooreIndiana Supreme Court · 1899
- Westphal v. HeckmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1916
- Gemmel v. FletcherSupreme Court of Kansas · 1907
- McNinch v. . Trust Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1922
- Vizard Investment Co. v. YorkCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1916
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.