Legal Opinion
State v. Runck
North Dakota Supreme Court
Decided July 27, 1995No. Crim. 940270PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LEVINE, Justice.
Clayton Runck, Jr., appeals from the judgment of conviction and the sentence imposed upon a jury verdict finding him guilty of theft. We affirm.
On May 14,1993, the State charged Runck with theft for possession of farm chemicals stolen in Minnesota. On July 1, 1993, the State filed an amended complaint also charging Runck with possession of tires stolen in Minnesota. The charge relating to the farm chemicals was dismissed upon motion of the State. 1 Runck was tried on the tire charge. A jury found Runck guilty. Judgment of conviction was entered and Runck appealed, challenging,…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Aguilar v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Spinelli v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- United States v. SalvucciSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- State v. WinklerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
- State v. HageNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
- State v. WamreNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
- Greenwood v. MooreNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
- State v. ClarkNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.