Legal Opinion
State v. Clark
North Dakota Supreme Court
Decided October 21, 1997No. Criminal 960344, 970109, and 970231PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
VANDE WALLE, Chief Justice.
[¶ 1] Daniel J. Clark appealed from a jury verdict finding him guilty of manslaughter, from the judgment of conviction, and from orders denying his motions for a new trial. We affirm.
[¶ 2] Early on January 17, 1996, Daniel Clark shot George Girodengo twice, after finding him in Clark’s wife’s bedroom. Giro-dengo died in surgery. Clark was charged with murder. On May 17, 1996, a jury returned a verdict finding Clark not guilty of murder, but guilty of manslaughter.
[¶ 3] A judgment of conviction was entered on June 25, 1996. On June 28, 1996, Clark moved for an…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Weatherford v. BurseySupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Trammel v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Jaffee v. RedmondSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Smith v. BarrySupreme Court of the United States · 1992
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- State v. PerezOhio Supreme Court · 2009
- State v. BeelerSupreme Court of Missouri · 2000
- Clark v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
- State v. MagnusonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
- State v. OsierNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.