Legal Opinion
Droste v. BOARD OF COUNTY COM'RS OF PITKIN
Supreme Court of Colorado
Decided May 14, 2007No. 05SC823PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hobbs
We granted certiorari to review the court of appeals' opinion in Droste v. Board of County Commissioners, 141 P.3d 852 (Colo.App.2005).1 By means of section 30-28-*603106(4)(b), the General Assembly required Pit-kin County to adopt a master plan for its unincorporated area by January 8, 2004. Through a public hearing on April 9, 2003, the Board of County Commissioners of Pitkin County adopted an ordinance imposing a temporary moratorium preventing all county departments, agencies, and boards from processing land use applications, with certain exceptions, in the Owl Creek Planning Area and the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Tahoe-Sierra Preservation Council, Inc. v. Tahoe Regional Planning AgencySupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Board of County Commissioners v. Bainbridge, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1996
- Almquist v. Town of MarshanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
- McCurley v. City of El RenoSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
- Cappture Realty Corp. v. BD. OF ADJ. ELMWOOD PK.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1973
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Zelenoy v. Colorado Department of Revenue, Motor Vehicle DivisionColorado Court of Appeals · 2008
- Berger v. City of BoulderColorado Court of Appeals · 2008
- Colorado Mining Ass'n v. Board of County Commissioners of Summit CountySupreme Court of Colorado · 2009
- Droste v. BOARD OF COUNTY COM'RS OF PITKINSupreme Court of Colorado · 2007