State v. Keitt
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
BRITT, Judge.
Defendants assign as error the denial of their motions to be tried separately. This assignment has no merit. The two defendants were charged with identical offenses that were connected and tied together in time, place and circumstances. The consolidation for trial of the cases charging them with possession of heroin under the facts appearing is fully authorized by the statutory and case law of our State. G.S. 15-152; State v. Yoes, et al., 271 N.C. 616, 157 S.E. 2d 386 (1967); State v. Walker, et al., 6 N.C. App. 447, 170 S.E. 2d 627 (1969).
Defendants assign as error the denial…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Fahy v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
- State v. TaylorSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
- State v. YoesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
- State v. SheddSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. ConnardCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
- State v. CumberCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1977
- State v. SousaCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1976
- State v. ConnardCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986