Legal Opinion

Silverthorne v. Coastal Land Co.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided July 3, 1979No. 783SC844PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ARNOLD, Judge.

Original Plaintiffs ’ Appeal

In his order dismissing the plaintiffs’ action, the trial court concluded that the plaintiffs’ failure to file answers to interrogatories within 60 days of 5 April 1976, as they had been ordered by the court to do, was “wholly without justification or excuse.” Plaintiffs argue that there is no evidence to support this conclusion. •

Plaintiffs’ view is that defendants were required to show that plaintiffs’ failure to comply with the court order was without justification, but this is not the case. G.S. 1A-1, Rule 37(b)(2) sets out possible consequences…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hammer v. AllisonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1974
  2. Deutsch v. FisherCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1977
  3. Hammer v. AllisonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Routh v. WeaverCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
  2. Cheek v. PooleCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1996
  3. Stone v. MartinCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982
  4. Webster Enterprises, Inc. v. Selective InsuranceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1997
  5. Atlantic Veneer Corp. v. RobbinsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1999

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API