Silverthorne v. Coastal Land Co.
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
ARNOLD, Judge.
Original Plaintiffs ’ Appeal
In his order dismissing the plaintiffs’ action, the trial court concluded that the plaintiffs’ failure to file answers to interrogatories within 60 days of 5 April 1976, as they had been ordered by the court to do, was “wholly without justification or excuse.” Plaintiffs argue that there is no evidence to support this conclusion. •
Plaintiffs’ view is that defendants were required to show that plaintiffs’ failure to comply with the court order was without justification, but this is not the case. G.S. 1A-1, Rule 37(b)(2) sets out possible consequences…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Hammer v. AllisonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1974
- Deutsch v. FisherCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1977
- Hammer v. AllisonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
3Cited by13 opinions
- Routh v. WeaverCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
- Cheek v. PooleCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1996
- Stone v. MartinCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982
- Webster Enterprises, Inc. v. Selective InsuranceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1997
- Atlantic Veneer Corp. v. RobbinsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1999
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.