Legal Opinion

Smith v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided November 6, 1984No. 8315SC1102PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EAGLES, Judge.

The main issue presented on appeal is whether, notwithstanding the language of G.S. 20-310(g), Nationwide must comply with the mandate of G.S. 20-310(f) when it declines to renew an automobile liability insurance policy for nonpayment of premium after mailing to its insured a “Premium Notice” and an “Expiration Notice.” The plaintiffs contend that on 5 July 1979 the insurance policy issued by Nationwide was still in full force and effect as a matter of law because Nationwide had failed to comply with the requirements of G.S. 20-310(f) relating to cancellation or refusal to renew…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Johnson v. Phoenix Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  2. Asheville Contracting Co. v. City of WilsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983
  3. Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company v. DavisCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1970

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Smith v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
  2. In Re McDonaldCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1999
  3. Smith v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
  4. Peerless Insurance v. FreemanCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API