Legal Opinion

Smith v. J.H. Berry Realty Co., Inc.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided June 24, 1988No. 86-455PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The plaintiffs, Harold and Mavis Smith, appeal from a summary judgment granted for J.H. Berry Realty Company ("Berry Realty") in a fraud action.

The alleged fraud concerns a representation by an agent of Berry Realty that a house purchased by plaintiffs was located on a parcel of land in such a way as to be in compliance with zoning regulations. This case has a rather long history. See Smith v. City ofGardendale, 508 So.2d 250 (Ala. 1987).

In February 1979, the Smiths were interested in a new home. They were shown the property at 944 Brookridge Drive in Gardendale, Alabama, by an agent of Berry…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Bedwell Lumber Co., Inc. v. T & T CORP.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1980
  2. Earnest v. Pritchett-Moore, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1981
  3. Ex Parte LeoSupreme Court of Alabama · 1985
  4. Halbrooks v. JacksonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1986
  5. Roney v. RaySupreme Court of Alabama · 1983

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Boros v. BaxleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1993
  2. Hunt Petroleum Corp. v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 2004
  3. Barnes v. BIRMINGHAM INTERN. RACEWAYSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  4. Liberty Nat. Life Ins. Co. v. AllenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1997
  5. Ex Parte Dial Kennels of Alabama, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1999

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API