Legal Opinion

Earnest v. Pritchett-Moore, Inc.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided July 10, 1981No. 80-196PublishedCited by 58 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Appeal from the grant of summary judgment in favor of all defendants. We affirm.

The complaint alleged fraudulent misrepresentations against all defendants arising out of an attempt to effect an insurance adjustment following collision damage to the plaintiff's vehicle. In Count One plaintiff alleged:. . . .

4. That on or about the 12th day of May, 1980, Gragg Robinson, an agent of Pritchett-Moore, Inc., while acting within the line and scope of his authority, authorized the Plaintiff to have his automobile repaired and averred that All Risk Insurance Company, the insurance carrier for the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. International Resorts, Inc. v. LambertSupreme Court of Alabama · 1977
  2. Folmar v. Montgomery Fair Company, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1975
  3. Jordan & Sons v. PickettSupreme Court of Alabama · 1884
  4. Southern Loan & Trust Co. v. GissendanerAlabama Court of Appeals · 1912
  5. Jakob v. First Alabama Bank of MontgomerySupreme Court of Alabama · 1978

3Cited by58 opinions

  1. Bank of Red Bay v. KingSupreme Court of Alabama · 1985
  2. GREEN TREE ACCEPTANCE v. StandridgeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1990
  3. P & S BUSINESS v. South Cent. Bell TelephoneSupreme Court of Alabama · 1985
  4. William S. Kaye, as Receiver for Barterline, Ltd. v. Pawnee Construction Company, Inc., Birmingham Trust National BankCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1982
  5. Russellville Production Credit Ass'n v. FrostSupreme Court of Alabama · 1986

53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API