Legal Opinion

Halbrooks v. Jackson

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided August 29, 1986No. 85-306PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Appeal by plaintiffs, George T. Halbrooks and Martha S. Halbrooks, from a summary judgment granted in favor of defendant Wayne Jackson in plaintiffs' action against Jackson and others based upon fraudulent misrepresentation. We affirm.

The action arose from a real estate transaction. Plaintiffs alleged in their complaint that Jackson (the owner of the land in question), Contempo Properties, Inc. (hereinafter "Contempo"), and Louis Dawkins placed a newspaper advertisement representing that Contempo had certain real property for sale, namely, a three-bedroom house situated on two and one-half…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Bedwell Lumber Co., Inc. v. T & T CORP.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1980
  2. Mahoney v. ForsmanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1983
  3. Williams v. Dan River Mills, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1971
  4. Mid-State Homes, Incorporated v. HoltCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1974

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Bass v. SOUTHTRUST BANK OF BALDWIN CTY.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  2. Liberty Nat. Life Ins. Co. v. AllenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1997
  3. Smith v. J.H. Berry Realty Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1988
  4. SOUTHERN LIFE AND HEALTH INS. v. SmithSupreme Court of Alabama · 1987
  5. Alfa Realty, Inc. v. BallCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1998

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API