Legal Opinion

Barnes v. BIRMINGHAM INTERN. RACEWAY

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided June 16, 1989No. 88-386PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Michael W. Barnes brought suit against Birmingham International Raceway, Inc. ("BIR"), the National Association for Stock Car Auto Racing, Inc. ("NASCAR"), Clayton Reuse, and Firestone Tire Rubber Co. ("Firestone") to recover damages for injuries he sustained while participating in an automobile race. BIR, Reuse, NASCAR, and Firestone filed motions for summary judgment, relying on two exculpatory pre-race releases signed by Barnes. The trial court granted the motions, and Barnes appealed. We affirm in part; reverse in part; and remand.

Summary judgment is proper where there is no genuine issue…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Gross v. SweetNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
  2. Torres v. State Farm Fire & Cas. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1983
  3. Lynn Strickland Sales & Serv., Inc. v. AERO-LANE FAB., INC.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1987
  4. Lee v. Allied Sports Associates, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1965
  5. Winterstein v. WilcomCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1972

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Tayar v. Camelback Ski Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
  2. Ex Parte ThicklinSupreme Court of Alabama · 2002
  3. San Francisco Residence Club, Inc. v. Baswell-GuthrieDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 2012
  4. Reece v. FinchSupreme Court of Alabama · 1990
  5. Wolfgang v. Mid-American Motorsports, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 1995

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API