Legal Opinion

State v. Dokken

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided August 18, 1992No. C0-92-747PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

RANDALL, Judge.

The state appeals a downward disposi-tional sentencing departure from the presumptive sentence of 98 months for respondent’s first degree criminal sexual conduct conviction. We affirm.

FACTS

Respondent Eric James Dokken pleaded guilty to one count of first degree criminal sexual conduct and one count of second degree criminal sexual conduct involving two six-year-old boys, in violation of Minn. Stat. §§ 609.342, subd. 1(a), 609.343, subd. 1(a) (1990). As part of a plea agreement, additional charges for incidents allegedly occurring between 1986 and 1989 involving two other…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. State v. KindemSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
  2. State v. GarciaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
  3. State v. TrogSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
  4. State v. HennumSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
  5. State v. BestSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. FavelaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1996
  2. State v. SejnohaCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1994
  3. State v. SheppardCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1998
  4. State v. FavelaCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1995
  5. State v. HanfCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2004

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API