Legal Opinion

People v. McGill

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 30, 1927No. Docket No. 1455PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McLUCAS, J.,

pro tem. — In this case the information charges the defendant McGill and one Prank McGettigan in count one with the crime of burglary and in count two with the crime of grand larceny.

Defendant McGettigan entered a plea of guilty. Defendant McGill stood trial and was found guilty of the crime of second degree burglary and of the crime of grand larceny. He appeals from the judgment pronouncing sentence and from the order denying his motion for a new trial.

Defendants were employed as window washers of the outside windows on the first floor of Blackstone’s store in Los Angeles. On…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. People v. FerdinandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
  2. People v. KingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1865
  3. People v. RuefCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1910
  4. People v. WelchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1874
  5. People v. MayesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. People v. CassandrasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
  2. People v. GrimesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
  3. State v. SorrellArizona Supreme Court · 1964
  4. People v. BuyleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
  5. People v. BonillaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API