Legal Opinion

People v. Suber

New York Court of Appeals

Decided May 8, 2012PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Graffeo, J.

The issue in this appeal is whether a defendant’s admissions must be corroborated in order to satisfy the prima facie case requirement for an information. We hold that corroboration is not necessary in this context.

Defendant Frank Súber registered as a level three sex offender in 1999. At that time, he received written notification that any change in his home address had to be communicated to the Division of Criminal Justice Services (DCJS) and that he also had to personally verify his residence address with local law enforcement officials every 90 days. In…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. People v. AlejandroNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
  2. People v. CaseyNew York Court of Appeals · 2000
  3. People v. KalinNew York Court of Appeals · 2009
  4. People v. KoniecznyNew York Court of Appeals · 2004
  5. People v. BelloNew York Court of Appeals · 1998

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. People v. WatsonNew York Court of Appeals · 2012
  2. The People v. Marquan M. / County of AlbanyNew York Court of Appeals · 2014
  3. Board of Trustees of The Vil. of Groton v. PirroAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
  4. People v. HernandezAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2015
  5. People v. HumphreyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2022

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API