Legal Opinion

People v. Hernandez

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided February 17, 2015PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

Ordered that the order is modified, as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice, by providing that defendant’s motion to dismiss the accusatory instrument is granted unless within 60 days of the date of this decision and order the People file and serve the necessary certificates of translation as set forth in the decision herein; in the event the People timely serve and file the certificates, the motion is denied.

On January 29, 2012, the People charged defendant with forcible touching (Penal Law § 130.52) based on an inculpatory statement by defendant…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People v. SuberNew York Court of Appeals · 2012
  2. In re Shaquana S.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
  3. People v. BanchsCriminal Court of the City of New York · 1997
  4. People v. HonshjCriminal Court of the City of New York · 1998
  5. People v. Wing Choi LoNew York Supreme Court · 1991

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. People v. Allen (Charo)Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2019
  2. People v. BrooksCriminal Court of the City of New York · 2016
  3. People v. Brooks (Kieth)Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2019
  4. People v. Edwards (John)Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2018
  5. People v. MaslowskiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API