People v. Bello
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Wesley, J.
Creativity in the marketplace is not restricted to lawful commercial activity. In this case we are called upon to determine whether the evidence before the Grand Jury, which indicated that defendant acted as a “screener” for the sale of crack cocaine by another, was legally sufficient to sustain the charge against him for criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree as an accomplice. We conclude that it was and therefore affirm the order of the Appellate Division reinstating the indictment.
The evidence before the Grand Jury indicated that at…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- People v. JenningsNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
- People v. SwampNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
- People v. DeeganNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
- People v. MayoNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
- People v. KaplanNew York Court of Appeals · 1990
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by165 opinions
- People v. MillsNew York Court of Appeals · 2003
- People v. GarsonNew York Court of Appeals · 2006
- People v. SuberNew York Court of Appeals · 2012
- People v. GrantNew York Court of Appeals · 2011
- People v. WarrenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
160 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.