Legal Opinion

People v. Epstean

New York Court of General Session of the Peace

Decided February 15, 1918PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Motion to dismiss indictment charging defendants with a violation of the Donnelly Anti-Trust Act.

1Opinion of the Court

Mulqueen, J.:

This is a motion to dismiss an indictment charging the defendants with a violation of the Donnelly Anti-Trust Act.* There are two counts, practically identical, alleging that there are more than forty persons, firms and corporations separately engaged in competition with one another in the business of manufacturing “ and selling what are commonly known as photoengravings, which are used for the purpose of printing illustrations and pictures, and which are articles and commodities in common "use,” and that these persons and corporations constituted a majority of all engaged in…

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. Addyston Pipe & Steel Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
  2. Curran v. . GalenNew York Court of Appeals · 1897
  3. Matter of DaviesNew York Court of Appeals · 1901
  4. Bossert v. . DhuyNew York Court of Appeals · 1917
  5. Queen Insurance v. StateTexas Supreme Court · 1893

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Gayer v. WhelanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
  2. Overland Publishing Co. v. H. S. Crocker Co.California Supreme Court · 1924
  3. Overland Publishing Co. v. Union Lithograph Co.California Court of Appeal · 1922
  4. Standard Engraving Co. v. VolzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1922
  5. Purofied Down Products Corp. v. National Ass'n of Bedding ManufacturersNew York Supreme Court · 1951

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API