United States v. Continental Can Company
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
FREDERICK van PELT BRYAN, District Judge.
This is a civil action by the United States to enjoin the proposed acquisition by defendant Continental Can Company, Inc. (Continental) of defendant Hazel-Atlas Glass Company (Hazel-Atlas) on the ground that such acquisition would violate § 7 of the Clayton Act as amended. 1 The court has jurisdiction over parties and subject matter.
The Government had previously attempted to block the acquisition by invoking a consent decree which had been entered against Continental in 1950 in a civil anti-trust suit under §§ 1 and 2 of tile Sherman Act and § 3 of the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Brown Shoe Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- United States v. E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1956
- Times-Picayune Publishing Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- United States v. E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1957
- The Kansas City Star Company v. United States of America, Emil A. Sees v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1957
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- United States v. Continental Can Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Highland Supply Corporation v. Reynolds Metals Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1964
- United States v. Wilson Sporting Goods Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1968
- Highland Supply Corporation v. Reynolds Metals CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 1965
- United States v. Lever Brothers CompanyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1963
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.