Legal Opinion

United States v. Continental Can Company

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided April 15, 1963PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FREDERICK van PELT BRYAN, District Judge.

This is a civil action by the United States to enjoin the proposed acquisition by defendant Continental Can Company, Inc. (Continental) of defendant Hazel-Atlas Glass Company (Hazel-Atlas) on the ground that such acquisition would violate § 7 of the Clayton Act as amended. 1 The court has jurisdiction over parties and subject matter.

The Government had previously attempted to block the acquisition by invoking a consent decree which had been entered against Continental in 1950 in a civil anti-trust suit under §§ 1 and 2 of tile Sherman Act and § 3 of the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Brown Shoe Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. United States v. E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1956
  3. Times-Picayune Publishing Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  4. United States v. E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1957
  5. The Kansas City Star Company v. United States of America, Emil A. Sees v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1957

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. United States v. Continental Can Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Highland Supply Corporation v. Reynolds Metals Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1964
  3. United States v. Wilson Sporting Goods Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1968
  4. Highland Supply Corporation v. Reynolds Metals CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 1965
  5. United States v. Lever Brothers CompanyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1963

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API