Legal Opinion

Whitehall Leather Co. v. Capek

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided July 26, 1966No. Docket 949PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBurns, J.

Appellant filed its complaint to establish a prescriptive easement. The trial court denied the request and dismissed the complaint.

The appellant owns and operates a tannery in the city of Whitehall that has been in operation since before the turn of the century. North of, and adjacent to, appellant’s tannery is the appellees’ vacant property through which runs a spur railroad track connecting the tannery with a main line of the Chesapeake & Ohio railroad.

The appellees purchased the property, lots 10-14, from Arthur J. Daane, and lots 15-19 from Franldin A. Speese, in November, 1964.

The spur…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Burns v. FosterMichigan Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Bean v. BeanMichigan Supreme Court · 1910
  3. Barley v. FisherMichigan Supreme Court · 1934
  4. Menter v. First Baptist ChurchMichigan Supreme Court · 1909
  5. King v. Battle Creek Box Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1926

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Hart v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Rose v. FullerMichigan Court of Appeals · 1970
  3. Caywood v. Department of Natural ResourcesMichigan Court of Appeals · 1976
  4. De Hollander v. Holwerda GreenhousesMichigan Court of Appeals · 1973
  5. Ogorek v. LoisellMichigan Court of Appeals · 1971

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API