Legal Opinion

King v. Battle Creek Box Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 7, 1926No. Docket No. 38PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSteere, J.

The parties to this suit own adjoining land in the city of Battle Creek, Michigan, deriving their titles through mesne conveyances from a common grantor. Prior to March 6, 1902, the Consumer’s Ice & Coal Company, Limited, owned some property described as lots 97-98-99-100 of Coleman’s addition “supplementary to range of blocks number eight (8) of the city of Battle Creek, according to the recorded plat thereof.” This property, as appears from the plat thereof in evidence, is bounded on the north by a street named Short, on the east by Division street, S., an indicated, unnamed alley on the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Bean v. BeanMichigan Supreme Court · 1910
  2. Menter v. First Baptist ChurchMichigan Supreme Court · 1909

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Di Pasco v. ProsserSupreme Court of Missouri · 1954
  2. Ruggles v. DandisonMichigan Supreme Court · 1938
  3. Whitehall Leather Co. v. CapekMichigan Court of Appeals · 1966
  4. Carr v. BartellMichigan Supreme Court · 1943
  5. Comforto v. SkirkeMichigan Supreme Court · 1939

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API