Legal Opinion

People v. Gershenhorn

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 24, 1964No. Crim. 9605PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKingsley, J.

Since the People do not here contest either the factual or conelusional allegations of appellant, we accept the facts as stated in appellant’s declaration filed in the court below.

Appellant was arrested and his business premises searched by officers of the Los Angeles Police Department, without a warrant and without reasonable grounds to believe him guilty of any criminal offense. As a result of the arrest and search, the officers seized certain business records and personal property of appellant, none of which was “contraband” as that term is used in connection with proceedings such as are…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. People v. CahanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  2. People v. ValentiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
  3. People v. MayenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
  4. People v. WrenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1922

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. People v. LaiwaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Flack v. Municipal Court for the Anaheim-Fullerton Judicial DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  3. People v. BeasleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
  4. People v. SanchezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
  5. People v. BeasleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API