Legal Opinion
Love v. Bishop
Supreme Court of Colorado
Decided March 19, 2018No. Supreme Court Case 16SC815PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JUSTICE HOOD delivered the Opinion of the Court.
¶ 1 Carole Bishop and Mark Klosky ("Klosky") 1 and Shannon and Keith Love ("the Loves") own adjacent parcels of land in Denver's Washington Park neighborhood. Klosky wants to remove a large tree sitting primarily on Klosky's property and partly on the Loves' property. The Loves want to keep the tree. Our seemingly straightforward task is to decide what analytical framework should govern this garden-variety dispute.
¶ 2 In undertaking this task, we do not write on a clean slate. Rhodig v. Keck holds that when a tree encroaches onto a neighbor's…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Payne v. TennesseeSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Public Service Co. of Colorado v. Van WykSupreme Court of Colorado · 2001
- Hoery v. United StatesSupreme Court of Colorado · 2003
- People v. LaRosaSupreme Court of Colorado · 2013
- People v. PorterSupreme Court of Colorado · 2015
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Brooke E. Rojas v. The People of the State of ColoradoSupreme Court of Colorado · 2022
- 20SC399 - Rojas v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 2022
- Francis RUDNICKI and Pamela Rudnicki, as parents, guardians and next friends of Alexander Rudnicki, a minor child v. Peter BIANCO, D.O.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2021
- Karyn GREGORY v. SAFECO INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA, Lisa Runkel and Sylvan T. Runkel, III v. Owners Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Colorado · 2024
- Jason P. Brown v. The People of the State of ColoradoSupreme Court of Colorado · 2026
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.