Legal Opinion

Fleece v. Kankey

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided April 3, 2002No. CA 01-1020PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Olly Neal, Judge.

The parties are adjoining landowners. They agreed that an old fence was the boundary line between them, and agreed to share in the cost of replacing the fence. The appellees bulldozed the old fence that separated the properties. They also bulldozed all the trees alongside the fence. Appellants accused appellees of erecting the new fence in the wrong location and of removing their trees without permission.

The trial court found that, with the exception of two posts that needed to be moved south two feet, the new fence was located in the same position as the old fence. The court…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Jennings v. BurfordCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1997
  2. Holmberg v. BerginSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1969
  3. Hedger Bros. Cement & Materials, Inc. v. StumpCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2000
  4. Revels v. KnightonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1991
  5. Ridge v. BlahaAppellate Court of Illinois · 1988

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. King v. PowellCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2004
  2. Schrader v. SchraderCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2003
  3. Pope v. OvertonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2011
  4. Linebarger v. OwenbyCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2002
  5. Love v. KloskyColorado Court of Appeals · 2016

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API