National Labor Relations Board v. Tapan Stove Co.
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
MARTIN, Circuit Judge.
This is another petition of the National Labor Relations Board for enforcement of its order in. the consideration of which we must constantly bear in mind that, though not in accord with the board’s decision, we are impelled to enforce it if upon consideration of the record as a whole it is apparent that the board’s findings are supported by substantial evidence. Title 29, U.S.C.A. § 160(e). The Supreme Court has repeatedly admonished the courts' of appeal as to their limited power of review of fact findings of the labor board. See for example authorities cited in S. H.…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- National Labor Relations Board v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
- National Labor Relations Board v. Link-Belt Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- International Association of MacHinists Tool and Die Makers Lodge No. 35 v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- National Labor Relations Board v. Pennsylvania Greyhound Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- National Labor Relations Board v. Falk Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- National Labor Relations Board v. Sharples Chemicals, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1954
- National Labor Relations Board v. General Shoe Corp.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1951
- Pittsburgh S. S. Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1950