Legal Opinion
In Re Estate of Seiler
California Supreme Court
Decided December 18, 1917No. S. F. No. 8189PublishedCited by 5 opinions
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Francisco. J. V. Coffey, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtMelvin, J.
The widow of Paul Seiler, deceased, appeals from a judgment admitting to probate two certain instruments as the last will and testament of said Paul Seiler.
One of the documents admitted to probate was dated July 6, 1909. The latter, which is dated October 8, 1914, is in form a codicil to the testator’s “last will.” By it he announces the republication “in every particular” of the said will theretofore made by him and then “in full force and effect, ’ ’ subject to certain' exceptions which we quote below:
“Because of the death of my son Adolph, I give one-third (%) of the business known as the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Booth v. Oakland Bank of SavingsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- Estate of GleasonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
- In Re Estate of KilbornCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
- In Re Estate of CarithersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
- Lavinburg v. SchwalbeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- In THE MATTER OF ANDERSON v. AndersonWyoming Supreme Court · 1953
- Estate of SackCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
- Estate of RiddelCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
- d'Oyley v. RiddelCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
- Jarvis v. ErnhartMissouri Court of Appeals · 1992