Legal Opinion

Estate of Sack

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 24, 1948No. Civ. 13776PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNouese, P. J.

This is an appeal from an order denying petition for probate of a letter offered as a codicil to a will. The trial court held that the letter was not written with testamentary intent and was not intended as a codicil to the will.

Edwin L. Sack died December 14, 1945, leaving a holographic will dated June 16, 1931, in which he left two rings to a friend, Dr. Eeiter, and the rest of his estate to his sister, Ida Sack, “without any reservation,” and designated the San Francisco Bank as executor and administrator. Upon petition of the bank this will was admitted to probate.

Thereafter the bank…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Marti v. AndersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  2. Land v. ClarkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  3. Payne v. PayneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1861
  4. In Re State of CuttingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
  5. Estate of MilesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Estate of FritzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
  2. Ferdun v. PlummerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API